Journal of Obstetric and Gynaecological Practices POGS

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2024 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

An Observational Study of Obstetric Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital Requiring Critical Care

Keeranmayee Mishra, Chirag Doshi, Charu Chandra, Apurba A Mishra

Keywords : Critical care, Gestational hypertension, Hemodynamic instability, High risk pregnancy, Labor monitoring, Maternal mortality, Mechanical ventilation, Obstetric complications, Perinatal morbidity

Citation Information : Mishra K, Doshi C, Chandra C, Mishra AA. An Observational Study of Obstetric Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital Requiring Critical Care. J Obstet Gynaecol 2024; 2 (2):58-61.

DOI: 10.5005/jogyp-11012-0038

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 14-08-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aims and objectives: Obstetric complications are becoming increasingly common in the present era, despite profound technological and healthcare advancements. The etiology is multifactorial, and our study aimed to review all obstetric patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in a Tertiary Referral Center over one year to characterize these patients about frequency, timing, and cause of admission and record the outcomes in terms of perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. Materials and methods: All antenatal and postnatal obstetric patients admitted to our center over one year in the ICU were reviewed. Obstetric data included gestational age at the time of admission and delivery, parity, type and place of delivery, indications of operative delivery, need for obstetric hysterectomy, and neonatal and maternal outcomes. Intensive care unit admitting diagnoses were divided into three categories respiratory failure, hemodynamic instability, and neurological dysfunction ICU-related data included the number of days in the ICU and the need for mechanical ventilation. Results: During the study period, the incidence of ICU admissions was 0.99%. Among these patients, 46% were aged 21–25 years. Primiparas accounted for 53%, and 61% had a gestational age of 34–42 weeks. Postpartum admissions to the ICU constituted 92%, with 81% due to obstetric complications, primarily eclampsia, and preeclampsia, which represented 46% of admissions. Medical complications accounted for 19% of admissions, with cardiac diseases being the most significant at 64%. Hemodynamic instability was the leading cause of ICU admission, at 50%, followed by neurologic complications at 33%. Of the ICU-admitted patients, 94% had already delivered, with 34% undergoing lower segment cesarean section and 34% having an obstetric hysterectomy for postpartum hemorrhage. Live births were 37% of all neonates, with 18% admitted to the neonatal ICU and subsequently discharged, and perinatal mortality stood at 39%. The overall maternal mortality rate in the ICU was 37%, predominantly due to hemodynamic shock. Ventilator support was successfully weaned in 51% of patients, who were then discharged. A further 12% were transferred to a higher-level facility, with the average duration of mechanical ventilation being 2 days and 6 hours. Conclusion: Eclampsia and preeclampsia were the leading causes of ICU admission. The leading cause of maternal mortality in the ICU was obstetric hemorrhage. The setting up of a high-dependency unit could lead to a decrease in the number of ICU admissions. Additionally, awareness of the importance of regular antenatal visits could help reduce obstetric complications.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Sriram S, Robertson MS. Critically ill obstetric patients in Australia: A retrospective audit of 8 years experience in a tertiary intensive care unit. Crit Care Resusc 2008;10(2):124. DOI: 10.1016/S1441-2772(23)01324-8.
  2. Vasquez DN, Das Neves AV, Vidal L, et al. Characteristics, outcomes, and predictability of critically ill obstetric patients: A multicenter prospective cohort study. Crit Care Med 2015;43(9):1887–1897. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001139.
  3. Bhatia M, Dwivedi LK, Banerjee K, et al. Pro-poor policies and improvements in maternal health outcomes in India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21(1):389. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03839-w.
  4. Zwart JJ, Dupuis JR, Richters A, et al. Obstetric intensive care unit admission: A 2-year nationwide population-based cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2010;36(2):256–263. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1707-x.
  5. Gupta H, Gandotra N, Mahajan R. Profile of obstetric patients in intensive care unit: A retrospective study from a Tertiary Care Center in North India. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(4):388–391. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23775.
  6. Pollock W, Rose L, Dennis CL. Pregnant and postpartum admissions to the intensive care unit: A systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2010;36(9):1465–1474. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-1951-0.
  7. Jean-Ju Sheen, Yongmei Huang, Jason D Wright, et al. Maternal age and preeclampsia outcomes. AJOG 2019;220(1):S222–S223. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.339.
  8. Farr A, Lenz-Gebhart A, Einig S, et al. Outcomes and trends of peripartum maternal admission to the intensive care unit. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2017;129(17–18):605–611. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-016-1161-z.
  9. Padilla CR, Shamshirsaz A. Critical care in obstetrics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2022;36(1):209–225. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2022.02.001.
  10. Dasgupta S, Jha T, Bagchi P, et al. Critically ill obstetric patients in a general critical care unit: A 5 years retrospective study in a public teaching hospital of Eastern India. Indian J Crit Care Med 2017;21(5):294. DOI: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_445_16.
  11. Sodhi K, Bansal V, Anupam S, et al. Predictors of mortality in critically ill obstetric patients in a Tertiary Care intensive care unit: A prospective 18 months study. Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care 2018;8(2):73–78. DOI: 10.4103/joacc.JOACC_57_17.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.