ORIGINAL ARTICLE


https://doi.org/10.5005/jogyp-11012-0040
Journal of Obstetric and Gynaecological Practices POGS
Volume 2 | Issue 2 | Year 2024

Clinical Study of Cases of Ruptured Uterus in Pregnancy


Saloni Agrawal1, Soma Bandyopadhyay2, Sipra Singh3, Asma R Kanue4

1–4Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Katihar Medical College, Katihar, Bihar, India

Corresponding Author: Saloni Agrawal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Katihar Medical College, Katihar, Bihar, India, Phone: +91 9001919702, e-mail: saloniagrawal096@gmail.com

How to cite this article: Agrawal S, Bandyopadhyay S, Singh S, et al. Clinical Study of Cases Of Ruptured Uterus In Pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Pract POGS 2024;2(2):55–57.

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

Received on: 25 April 2024; Accepted on: 05 July 2024; Published on: 14 August 2024

ABSTRACT

Introduction: One of the main risks of pregnancy is uterine rupture. Even in advanced nations, rupture of the gravid uterus continues to be a possibly lethal complication for both the mother and the fetus, despite advancements in obstetric care.

Materials and methods:

Study design: This retrospective research was conducted in a hospital.

Study place: The Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Katihar Medical College.

Study period: June 2021–May 2023.

Study population: A total of 18,521 antenatal admissions, of which 57 were admitted with a ruptured uterus.

An analysis was conducted on the case studies of 57 patients with ruptured uterus treated at KMCH, Katihar between June 2021 and May 2023. Age, gestational age, parity, blood transfusion requirement, risk factors, surgical finding, surgical management type, clinical presentation, and morbidity as well as mortality of the mother and fetus were among the many characteristics that were recorded.

Results: Incidence of the total 18,521 antenatal admissions during this period, 57 had ruptured the uterus giving an occurrence of 3.07/1,000 deliveries (0.3%). 54.4% of multiparous women and 59.7% of individuals with previously scarred uterus had a ruptured uterus. Repair was possible in only 29.8% of cases. The rate of perinatal mortality was 89.5, and 3.5% of deaths were maternal.

Conclusion: Uterine rupture poses a significant and potentially fatal risk to both the mother and the unborn child. The occurrence of uterine rupture is high in underdeveloped nations, such as India, and it is significantly higher in unscarred uteruses than in developed nations.

Keywords: Obstetric emergency, Perinatal outcome, Peripartum hysterectomy, Pregnancy outcomes, Rupture uterus.

INTRODUCTION

One significant obstetric risk is uterine rupture. Even with advancements in contemporary obstetrics, rupture of the gravid uterus continues to be a possibly deadly condition for the baby and mother, particularly in underdeveloped nations (Table 1 and Fig. 1).1 The incidence is high, because there are a lot of obstetric emergencies, which frequently come from rural areas with inadequate prenatal care.1

Table 1: Shows the incidence of uterine rupture by age
Age No. of patients Percentage (%)
20–25 18 31.50%
26–30 28 49.10%
31–35 10 17.54%
36 above 01 1.75%

Fig. 1: Shows the incidence of uterine rupture by age

In advanced nations, the occurrence of uterine rupture is about 1% for “women who have had a earlier caesarean section, while it” is highly uncommon (<1 per 10,000) for those who have not.2 Uterine rupture is a more common and significant issue in less developed and less advanced countries (Table 2 and Fig. 2). Total range of 0.1–1%.2

Table 2: Ruptured uterus risk factors
Risk factors No. of patients Percentage
Previous LSCS 34 59.6
Multiparity 31 54.4
Obstructed labor 19 33.3
Use of labor-inducing agents (Oxytocics) 10 17.5

Fig. 2: Ruptured uterus risk factors

Perinatal death varied from 74 to 92%, while maternal mortality was between 1 and 13% (Table 3 and Fig. 3).2

Table 3: Frequency of uterine rupture in the uterus with and without scars (unscarred)
Rupture in a scarred and unscarred uterus No. of patients Percentage
Scarred uterus 34 59.7
Unscarred uterus 23 40.3

Fig. 3: Frequency of uterine rupture in the uterus with and without scars (unscarred)

The most crucial elements in enhancing maternal and perinatal outcomes are an early diagnosis, fast treatment of the disease, and timely referral from the level of the gross root.3 The purpose of this retrospective investigation was to assess and examine numerous elements of a uterine rupture (Fig. 4 and Table 4).

Table 4: Intraoperative finding during laparotomy
Intraoperative finding No. of patients Percentage
Scar rupture 17 29.8
Extension to lower segment 26 45.6
Extension to upper and lateral segment 22 38.6
Bladder injury 10 17.5
Broad ligament hematoma 14 24.6

Fig. 4: Intraoperative finding during laparotomy

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design: This is a retrospective analysis conducted at a hospital.

Study place: Katihar Medical College, Katihar, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department.Study period: June 2021–May 2023.

Study population: A total of 18,521 antenatal admissions, of which 57 were admitted with a ruptured uterus.

Table 5: Surgical management in cases of ruptured uterus
Surgical management No. of patients Percentage
Repair with B/L tube ligation 11 19.3
Repair without B/L tube ligation 06 10.5
Subtotal hysterectomy 34 59.7
Total hysterectomy 06 10.5
Table 6: Maternal morbidity associated with ruptured uterus
Morbidity and mortality No. of patients Percentage
Shock 39 68.4
Blood transfusion 52 91.2
Anemia 54 94.7
Wound infection 08 14
Pyrexia 13 22.8

RESULTS

Incidence Of the total 18,521 antenatal admissions during this period, 57 had ruptured the uterus giving an occurrence of 3.07/1000 deliveries (0.3%).

It is higher, at 1.69%, in developing nations like Nigeria, per a study by Ibrahim SM, Umar NI, et al. In wealthy nations, the occurrence is roughly 10 times lower. In Australia, it is 0.086%, according to research by Lynch JC, Pardy JP, et al.

MORTALITY

Two (3.5%) cases of maternal death and 51 (89.5%) cases of perinatal mortality were documented.

DISCUSSION

A ruptured uterus is a treatable but possibly fatal illness that needs to be diagnosed and treated very soon. The occurrence of a ruptured uterus in the current investigation was 0.3%. Mahbuba and Alam (0.83%) and Alam et al. (1.14%) studies found a higher incidence.4,5 As a tertiary referral center, the majority of cases that come to our hospital are already in a moribund state. Research carried out in developing countries also revealed that the occurrence of ruptured uterus was primarily determined by the low socioeconomic status of the population and inadequate health facilities in rural areas.

About 59.7% of the cases in this study with previously scarred uterus had ruptured uteruses. 40.3% of uterus that are not scarred. The same significant frequency of uterine rupture in the unscarred uterus was additionally observed in Saini VK et al. study. Most cases of untreated obstructed labor, which are common in rural areas, lead to uterine rupture in an unscarred uterus.6 In 54.4% of the instances in the current study, multiparous women had a ruptured uterus. It was greater than the Malik HS research (42.7%).7 The primary treatment methods included laparotomy and rapid resuscitation. Only 29.8% of the cases could be repaired, which is lesser than the 39.2% of cases in the investigation by Rathod S et al.8 Perinatal mortality was recorded at 89.5%. Research by Rathod et al. found a similar outcome (90.5%). The current study’s maternal death rate of 3.5% was comparable to Sahu L result of 2.76%.8,9

CONCLUSION

A major and possibly deadly consequence for both the mother and the unborn baby is uterine rupture. The occurrence of uterine rupture is extreme in underdeveloped nations, such as India, and it is significantly higher in unscarred uteruses than in developed nations. The occurrence of “rupture uterus” may be decreased with education and appropriate care, particularly for high-risk individuals who have had an earlier caesarean section. Early identification and management of protracted labor can also help to stop additional obstruction and rupture. Early referral and appropriate oxytocic usage are also crucial.10

REFERENCES

1. Philpott RH. Obstructed labor. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1982;9(3):625–640. PMID: 7172577.

2. Hofmeyr GJ, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: The prevalence of uterine rupture. BJOG 2005;112(9):1221–1222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00725.x.

3. Smith GC, Pell JP, Pasupathy D. Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after caesarean section: Retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2004;329(7462):375. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38160.634352.55.

4. Mahbuba, Alam IP. Uterine rupture: Experience of 30 cases at Faridpur Medical College Hospital. Faridpur Med Coll J 2012;7(2):79–81. DOI: 10.3329/fmcj.v7i2.13504.

5. Fofie C, Baffoe P. A two-year review of uterine rupture in a regional hospital. Ghana Med J 2010;44(3):98–102. DOI: 10.4314/gmj.v44i3.68892.

6. Saini VK, Yadav PA, Munshi SP, et al. Study of 30 cases of uterine rupture in teaching institution. Gujarat Med J 2012;67(2):132–134. DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175856.

7. Malik HS. Frequency, predisposing factors and fetomaternal outcome in uterine rupture. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2006;16(7):472–475. PMID: 16827959.

8. Rathod S, Samal SK, Swain S. Rupture uterus: A 3-year clinical study. J Clin Diagnostic Res 2015;9(11):QC04–QC06. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14554.6783.

9. Sahu L. A 10-year analysis of uterine rupture at a teaching institution. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2006;56(6):502–506. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3912.2082.

10. Vidyarthi A, Kumari S. Clinical study of cases of ruptured uterus in pregnancy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2018;7(1):253–256. DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175856.

________________________
© The Author(s). 2024 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.